Sunday, December 19, 2010

Lame-duck sessions supposed to be a thing of the past, historians say

"The trouble with lame-duck sessions began in 1801, when the outgoing Federalists used their last days in power to help appoint a bunch of judges. It flared up again in 1922, when President Warren Harding and the lame-duck Republicans tried to ram through unpopular legislation after their defeats. 

Opponents said this was un-democratic: These sessions seemed to violate the ever-popular Washington rule that "elections have consequences." Finally, Congress passed - and the states ratified - the 20th Amendment. 

Historians say lawmakers thought they were ending lame-duck Congresses forever."     [Washington Post]

No comments:

Post a Comment