Obama lawyer warned against certifying eligibility

"A former U.S. Justice Department attorney who founded the government watchdog Judicial Watch and later Freedom Watch has warned a key Barack Obama attorney that Democrat Party or state elections officials certifying Obama’s eligibility for the 2012 election could become the targets of election-fraud charges."      [WND]

 Interesting goings on here ......... read this article for the details, but it boils down to this:  Each state political party chairman is required by law to certify every candidate's eligibility to serve in the office for which he or she is running.

To meet this requirement, the national committee sends each state a certification.  The official certification has the phrase "the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution."

In the 2008 election cycle, the State of Hawaii passed a law REMOVING this requirement.  The remaining 49 states kept the requirement.  So how did Nancy Pelosi (the person submitting these certifications to every state) handle this?    

The certificate sent to Hawaii DOES HAVE the required statement, even though Hawaiian law does not require it.  The Democrats can wave THIS document around to demonstrate that they have met the certification and eligibility requirements.  At the same time, Hawaiian officials could not be found guilty of perjury if the statements are found to be false, as THEIR LAW does not require the statement.

For the other 49 states, Pelosi submitted the same document, BUT WITH THE "LEGALLY QUALIFIED TO SERVE" phrase omitted !  Thus state officials cannot be guilty of perjury because they did NOT swear the nominees were eligible.

Go to this web site for the complete story and copies of these documents. 

[clipper]