"The explanation Hillary Clinton gives to the “income inequality” crowd
for her high speaking fees would raise a lot of questions among the MSM
if her last name wasn’t “Clinton,” so instead the media just lap it up:
What is her salary from the foundation? How much of her expenses are
covered by family foundation money? How many members of her family make
salaries from that foundation? To what extent is the foundation an income
tax dodge? And didn’t Hillary Clinton recently portray herself as not
truly rich because she and Bill pay income tax on their money?"
[Michelle Malkin]
No comments:
Post a Comment